newsio aggregates and links to original sources. We do not own the original images or content. If you believe content infringes on intellectual property rights, contact us — it will be removed at first notice.
business/news//The Economic Times
US action is a direct response to China's expulsion of Vivian Wang.
The US revoked a Xinhua journalist's visa in direct retaliation for China expelling Vivian Wang.
KEY POINTS
Vivian Wang's expulsion was triggered by Taiwan's president appearing at a Times event she did not organize.
This tit-for-tat marks a rare instance of direct US retaliation against China's expulsion of American journalists.
Western media are now wary that interviewing Taiwan's president may risk losing reporting access in China.
Vivian Wang was among a few US correspondents allowed into China after a prior diplomatic agreement.
Synopsis
America has revoked the visa of a Chinese journalist working for Xinhua. This move follows Beijing's decision to expel a New York Times reporter. The US action is a direct response to China's expulsion of Vivian Wang. This tit-for-tat measure escalates tensions. It impacts media access for both nations. The situation highlights ongoing disputes over journalistic freedom.
Washington: The Trump administration has revoked the visa of a Chinese national working for the state news agency Xinhua in the United States, in an apparent reciprocal act to Beijing's decision to expel a New York Times reporter.
A person familiar with the matter confirmed the visa had been revoked. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the matter involves visa privacy. A State Department official confirmed there was a plan to revoke the visa.
Also Read: Trump leaves Beijing with few wins but warm words for Xi
The tit-for-tat move by the Trump administration has followed the expulsion by Beijing of Vivian Wang, a China correspondent for The New York Times, apparently over the appearance of the Taiwanese leader in a DealBook event in which Wang had no role. It was a rare occasion of the U.S. government directly retaliating against Beijing's expulsion of American journalists.
The Times, which first reported the reciprocal move by the Trump administration, said the newspaper does not ask governments to revoke media credentials or otherwise interfere with the work of any journalist. On Friday, the paper issued a statement calling for Wang to be reinstated as a credentialed journalist in China and urging both governments to "reverse this deterioration in journalist access."
Live Events
"The Chinese government's decision to expel Vivian Wang is wrong," Joseph Kahn, the paper's executive editor, said in a statement published on the Times' corporate website. "Her expulsion will make it even harder for our global audience to get accurate, independent and in-depth reporting about the world's second largest economy at a critical time."
Also Read: The Trump-Xi Summit: Facts behind the noise
The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
US media presence in China already dwindled
Wang is leaving China when the presence of U.S. media is already thin after previous rounds of disputes over journalistic credentials, leaving several U.S. news organizations with skeleton staffing in their China bureaus.
"The number of correspondents from American media outlets allowed to work in China has now fallen to an alarmingly low level, at a time when the need for people everywhere to understand China is greater than ever," Kahn wrote.
Beijing moved to expel Wang, a China correspondent for the newspaper since 2020, after the media group's DealBook Summit 2025 featured Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te in a recorded interview with host Andrew Ross Sorkin. Sorkin called Taiwan a country, and Lai warned of Beijing's aggressive behavior in the Taiwan Strait and vowed that "Taiwan will do everything necessary to protect itself."
The Chinese government claims sovereignty over Taiwan, which split from the mainland in 1949 after Mao Zedong's communists won a civil war. In the latest summit with President Donald Trump in Beijing, in mid-May, Chinese President Xi Jinping warned that China and the U.S. could "collide or even clash" over Taiwan if the issue is not handled properly.
Other Western media watching closely
The decision against The New York Times also has created unease among other Western media that might interview Lai, giving the self-governed island a voice, at the risk of losing their abilities to report within China.
All foreign journalists must be accredited by China's foreign ministry to report in China, and Beijing has used the accreditation and visa policy to expel or keep out foreign journalists whose work has upset the Chinese leadership or to show displeasure with what Beijing views as unfavorable or malicious coverage of China.
In 2020, for example, the Chinese government expelled three Wall Street Journal correspondents after the financial newspaper ran an opinion piece titled "China is the Real Sick Man of Asia" following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
As U.S.-China relations soured, the U.S. State Department in 2020 designated some major Chinese news groups as "foreign missions". Xinhua, for example, is tasked by the ruling Chinese Communist Party to serve as the mouthpiece of the party and the government, which includes distributing their official news.
Beijing in turn drastically limited visas for journalists working for U.S. media.
In total, at least 18 foreign journalists working for The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal were expelled in the first half of 2020, according to the Foreign Correspondents' Club of China. Many others were given short visas ranging from one month to three months, according to the group's annual survey.
The two governments later reached a one-time agreement that allowed U.S. media to send in a small number of correspondents to mainland China. Wang was one of them.
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)